Great Bay, New Hampshire. Photo by Cynthia Irwin
3

The Great Bay Estuary – A Natural Treasure in Need of Protection

Categories: Guest Posters

Nestled between New Hampshire and Maine, the Great Bay estuary is one of New England’s most remarkable natural resources. It lies at the confluence of tidally driven seawater from the Gulf of Maine and freshwater from seven major river systems – the Salmon Falls, Cocheco, Bellamy, Oyster, Lamprey, Squamscott, and Winnicut. Great Bay’s connection to the Gulf of Maine substantially influences the dynamics of the estuary, resulting in some of the strongest tidal currents in North America, as seawater must travel 12 miles inland through the Piscataqua River and Little Bay before reaching Great Bay.

This geographic configuration makes Great Bay one of the nation’s most recessed estuaries and it is often referred to as New Hampshire’s “hidden coast.” The watershed extends more than 1,000 square miles reaching many miles north of Portsmouth, New Hampshire’s only port. With over twenty percent of the watershed in the state of Maine, the estuary has defined the cultural history of the region since the first permanent settlements were established in 1620’s. 

For centuries, Great Bay has supported human activities as people were drawn to its abundant resources. Today, the estuary provides critically important habitat for a wide variety of fish, birds and other wildlife and remarkable recreational opportunities that contribute enormously to the coastal heritage of New Hampshire’s Seacoast region and southernmost Maine.

In light of these extraordinary values, Great Bay has been designated an estuary of national significance by both the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). EPA’s Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership (PREP) and NOAA’s Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (GBNERR) have developed comprehensive management plans that have resulted in research, education and land conservation initiatives designed to address the critical issues facing the estuary. Great Bay is also home to the Great Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

The estuary provides important fish habitat and is designated Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) by the National Marine Fisheries Service for numerous fish species in various life stages including Atlantic cod, haddock, pollock, yellowtail flounder, Atlantic mackerel and bluefish. Other species, such as a variety of herring, are forage fish that support the Gulf’s commercial fisheries by serving as an important building block in the marine food chain. Still other species, such as striped bass and bluefish, are important recreational fisheries.

Regrettably, the health of the estuary is in jeopardy. Similar to the multiple stressors affecting the Gulf of Maine – primarily related to population growth and low‐density sprawl – there is concern among scientists that Great Bay is approaching a tipping point which, once crossed, will make its recovery incredibly challenging and costly.

As the Great Bay-Piscataqua Waterkeeper my role is serving as the “eyes and ears” of the estuary, advancing needed policies and innovative solutions, and building a public voice to protect Great Bay for future generations. There is much work to be done.

The most recent State of the Estuaries report (PREP, 2013) documents a troubling trend – that with only three of fourteen pressure and condition indicators moving in a positive direction, the health of the estuary is in jeopardy due to increases in nutrients pollution. Most notably, impervious surfaces are increasing at six times the rate of population growth, making it that much more difficult to reduce nitrogen pollution.

 Eelgrass, the cornerstone of the estuary’s ecosystem, has suffered resulting in severe declines in the Piscataqua River and Little Bay. The overall distribution of eelgrass has decreased by more than a third since 1996 and biomass loss has been even more dramatic, declining by over two-thirds during the same timeframe. These habitat changes have negatively impacted local fish species. You can read about some of these changes as observed by a local scuba diver here. Due to disease, there also has been a dramatic decrease in oyster populations with a ninety percent decline since 1993.  Recent restoration efforts are aimed at slowly building back populations.

Despite the changes, one constant remains – Great Bay is a national treasure. I encourage you to visit the region and discover Great Bay’s wonders.

For more information about the Great Bay-Piscataqua Waterkeeper and my work to protect the Great Bay estuary, visit: http://www.clf.org/great-bay-waterkeeper/. You can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter.

Granite schooners, photo by Deborah Marx

Maritime Heritage at Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary

Categories: Guest Posters

Located at the mouth of Massachusetts Bay, Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary sits astride 400-year old shipping routes and fishing grounds for New England’s oldest ports.  Centuries of marine calamites have made the sanctuary’s seafloor an underwater museum.  Archaeological research has only begun to reveal these stories of the past. Beginning in 2000, sanctuary researchers took the first steps to locate and identify the historic shipwrecks in the sanctuary waters. Since then, the sanctuary has partnered with the Northeast Underwater Research Technology and Education Center (NURTEC) at the University of Connecticut to bring advanced remote sensing technologies to the sanctuary for shipwreck exploration.

When I joined the sanctuary research team in 2002, I was immediately impressed with the possibilities the sanctuary offered for archaeological research. Unlike other Federal waters, historic sanctuary shipwrecks are protected by regulations that prohibit their damage or disturbance (unfortunately fishing activities are exempted from these regulations, a significant gap in the sanctuary’s resource protection abilities). The sanctuary’s largely unexplored location and its relatively deep waters meant that artifacts have remained on sites ready to shed light on our ancestor’s maritime activities. Thus, archaeological discovery in the sanctuary is a thrilling process, from the first hints that side scan sonar has revealed a new shipwreck to the first observation of that site, either by SCUBA diving or remotely operated vehicle (ROV).

Lamartine 1 courtesy of NOAA_SBNMS_and_NURTEC_UConn

Anemones and a sea star living on Lamartine’s granite cargo. Note the manhole bored through the granite slab’s center for access to the underlying sewer basin. Courtesy of NOAA SBNMS and NURTEC UConn

 

Recent research on a sunken schooner, named Lamartine, highlighted the interesting investigative aspects of sanctuary maritime heritage research. Located in 2004 while searching for another shipwreck, archaeologists used NURTEC’s ROV to image the site; a pile of intricately shaped flat granite slabs lying on top of a wooden hull. Library research determined that the granite slabs were sewer catch basin covers used in the construction of street corners. Nearly 7 years of archival research failed to turn up any likely candidates for the shipwreck until a volunteer historian found the Lamartine’s story. A visit to the University of Maine’s library uncovered the granite quarry’s ledger that supplied Lamartine’s cargo confirming the shipwreck’s identity. During a May 1893 storm off Cape Ann, that cargo shifted capsizing the schooner and taking the life of one sailor. Next time you are walking the old streets of Boston or New York, look down and you might see one of these granite basin covers still in place over 100 years after its installation.

In juxtaposition to the dramatic stories of destruction encapsulated in Stellwagen Bank sanctuary shipwrecks, I am wowed by the vibrant marine life that now inhabits these oases of biodiversity.  Shipwreck structure provides ideal homes for many of New England’s undersea inhabitants. To so many, New England’s waters are cold, dark places, seemingly impenetrable from the beach.  The archaeological fieldwork I’ve conducted has revealed dozens of varieties of colorful organisms that would amaze people if they saw them living in their native habitat.

Valentine's Fish

For Valentine’s Day, a Special Love Note from the Sea

Categories: Creature Features

Flowers, a heart-shaped box of chocolates, a warm and tender love song, and a glittery card with completely over-the-top sugary sentiment…these are the tokens of affection we most recognize on Valentine’s Day. If you’re one of the lucky ones, that special someone will deliver a heartfelt token that makes your day even more meaningful.

It could be surprising to many people that in our complex and amazing world of ocean animals there are several creatures known for displaying the type of deep affection and commitment of which only romance novelists can dream. Tropical angelfish and at least one type of Australian seahorse are not strangers to life-long love beneath the waves. (And, by the way, is there any name more apropos to a day celebrating intimacy and devotion than that of the deep-sea sponge known as “Venus’s flower basket?”) There is even a small unglamorous freshwater fish known as the convict cichlid which pairs off into a crevasse made into a home to raise their children.

Without a doubt, our own Atlantic Wolffish exhibits the special bond of love suitable for Cupid’s attention. Male and female pairs (who reportedly mate for 3 to 6 hours at a time and practice internal fertilization, a rarity in fish) seek out their own special love nest under a craggy rock, or maybe down along the hull of a sunken wreck, just big enough to guard the egg mass laid by the female. The male wolffish, exhibiting no scientifically observed “commitment issues,” stands guard at his cave haven ensuring the protection of the growing larvae and juvenile offspring. The male is so devoted that he stops eating for as long as he is on guard, sometimes as long as four months. Not only is the wolffish pair committed to each other, they are highly loyal to their habitat.

Without a place to call their own, the wolffish love story could have an unhappy ending. With wolffish numbers having declined drastically in the last three decades, the connection between wolffish and their undisturbed habitat is even more important. Wolffish are still caught as bycatch in trawls and, possibly even more damaging to their long-term survival, their rocky habitat gets swept away by trawls and nesting areas can be buried in the sediment stirred up by trawling gear. Recreational anglers often catch wolffish, but it’s proven that the wolffish can be safely returned to the sea with the proper “catch and release” practice. (Wolffish do not have a swim bladder that “blows up” on the surface.) For both recreational and commercial fishermen in federal and state waters in New England it is illegal to possess or land Atlantic wolffish. If enforced properly, this can be a great step forward for wolffish conservation.

Now, it may be said that the Atlantic wolffish has a face that only its mother could truly love. But isn’t that the mystery of love itself – finding one’s counterpoint in the ocean of uncertainty can be anything but predictable.

January Photo Contest Winner

Announcing our January Photo Contest Winner!

Categories: Photo Contest

Congratulations to Matthew Lawrence, the photographer of our January winning photo! The photo shows a rare Atlantic wolffish taking shelter under a sunken trawler in the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary. We love the way it highlights this charismatic (if a bit homely) fish.

If you have pictures to share, there’s still time left in our February contest! Even better, we have a very special prize for this month’s winner. The winning photo will be displayed in the New England Ocean Odyssey booth at the Boston Sea Rovers Show, March 9-10. At the end of the show, the winner will receive an enlarged print of their photo.

Entering is easy! Explore New England’s oceans, take some photographs and then share them with our online community on Flickr™. All you need to do is add your photos to the New England Ocean Odyssey group and tag them “PhotoContestNEOO2012”. Find out more here.

Also check our our New England Ocean Odyssey Facebook page where we’ll be posting the honorable mentions from the January photo contest over the next few days.

We look forward to seeing your photos!

Blizzard of '78

The Blizzard of ’78 – 35 Years Later, What Have We Learned?

Categories: CLF Scoop

Sometimes hardy New Englanders take perverse pride in the bad weather we endure. But that didn’t stop us from getting very concerned when Sandy headed our way last October. And it didn’t help to prevent the tragic losses that piled up during the Blizzard of ’78, which formed off the coast of South Carolina 35 years ago today, then pounded New England for two days after that.

The Blizzard of ’78 was really more of a winter hurricane than a blizzard. And not just a hurricane, but a “bomb”  – a meteorological term that refers to how quickly pressure fell during the storm’s formation. People were caught unprepared for the rapidly deteriorating conditions, leading to dozens of fatalities on land and at sea. Not only were thousands of people stranded on the roads, unable to get to safety, but the suddenness of the storm took mariners by surprise as well. In his bestseller Ten Hours Until Dawn, New England author Michael Tougias tells the riveting and tragic story of what occurred as several vessels rushed to the aid of a heating oil tanker that was taking on water after running aground in Salem Sound. The tanker was fine in the end, but the Can Do, one of the boats that attempted to provide assistance, was not – sinking with all hands lost.

The overall devastation from the storm was enormous. Tougias describes the aftermath well:

“In Rockport, cars were flung into the Old Harbor along with a house. Bearskin Neck houses were crushed, then ripped by the seas, including the red wooden building known as Motif #1, a popular subject for artists.”

 

“Motif #1” in Rockport was severely damaged during the Blizzard of ’78. (Photo by Mass.gov)

“Motif #1” in Rockport was severely damaged during the Blizzard of ’78. (Photo by Mass.gov)

 

“Up and down the Massachusetts coast, seawalls were flattened and hundreds of residents became trapped in their houses, encircled by swirling water that prevented them from running to higher ground.”

Particularly hard hit was Revere, just north of Boston and south of Salem… Three homes were totally leveled and several others suffered extensive damage from fire. However, it was the breaching of the seawall that did the most damage… The Beachmont section of Revere saw the worst devastation. Homes were bobbing down the streets, and many people thought they would literally be swallowed up by the sea.”

 

The breaching of the seawall in Revere left extensive destruction on Ocean Ave. (photo by the Boston Globe)

The breaching of the seawall in Revere left extensive destruction on Ocean Ave. (photo by the Boston Globe)

 

One of the reasons the destruction was so extensive from the Blizzard of ’78 was its horribly timed concurrence with an astronomical high tide. You may recall a more recent storm that visited our shores with the same bad timing.

Sandy reset our collective notion of “storm damage” in the Northeast. Most of us will never forget the images that scrolled across our screens that awful night (those of us that didn’t lose power, anyway), of subway tunnels flooding and horrible fires and a dark, so dark, New York City. More than three months later thousands of people are still suffering without heat or homes in Sandy’s aftermath. Nobody was really prepared for the scale of Sandy’s ravages. But Sandy was not a complete surprise. There have been some notable forerunners.

We’ve had our share of big storms on the East Coast. The Blizzard of ’78, of course, stands out. And 1938 is legendary for the Hurricane of 1938, or “The Long Island Express,” which rocketed up the coast at an unprecedented 70 miles per hour, taking out communications as it went, preventing people in its path from getting warning about the cataclysm that was headed their way.

1991 was an especially bad year – bringing us Hurricane Bob, the second costliest hurricane in U.S. history at the time, in mid-August, and the unnamed hurricane that sprang, very bizarrely, from the “Perfect Storm” that fall, which damaged parts of New England even worse than Bob had.

We know these big storms will come our way from time to time. We also know that our seas are rising – simply put, as they get warmer they expand. Disturbingly, we have recently come to understand that the sea is rising much faster in the Northeast than the global average. The ocean is coming closer, and the big storms will keep coming as well.  It’s time to get our act together and plan better for these big storms. We are weather-hardy in New England, but we are also smart enough to get prepared.

We can and should plan ahead. Employing the principles of regional ocean planning will help our coastal communities prepare for the next storm, using tools like the Boston Harbor Association’s model for “no regrets” adaptation to sea level rise, Massachusetts’ Storm Smart Coasts, and NOAA’s Hazard-Resilient Coastal & Waterfront Smart Growth, and building on lessons we are learning from our tempestuous history. We need a comprehensive, science-based, and participatory process that allows everyone who will be affected by decisions about our coastal areas to have a say in how we prepare for storms and sea level rise, and how we respond in the aftermath.

Hopefully it will be a very long time before we have to find out how ready we are for the next big storm – how well we have learned from the Blizzard of ’78, from Sandy, Bob, and the others. But, just in case we don’t have long to wait, let’s roll up our sleeves, get prepared, and make a plan for the worst.